MIA: Encyclopedia of Marxism: Glossary of People



Scott Nearing

Nearing, Scott (1883-1983)

American radical economist, educator, writer, political activist, and advocate of simple living.

Scott Nearing was born August 6, 1883 at Morris Run, Tioga County, Pennsylvania, the heart of the state’s coal country. Nearing’s grandfather, Winfield Scott Nearing, had arrived in Tioga County with his family in 1864, at the age of 35, when he accepted a job as a civil and mining engineer. Fefore the end of the year he had assumed full control of mining operations as the superintendent of the Morris Run Coal Company, a position of authority which he held for the remainder of his workng life.[1] An intense, driven man, Scott Nearing’s grandfather studied science and nature, practiced gardening and carpentry, and regularly received crates of books from New York City, amassing a large personal library.[2] In his memoirs written late in his life, Scott Nearing would recall his grandfather as one of the four most influential figures in his life.[3] Nearing’s upbringing was that of a young bourgeois, his mother employing a part-time tutor and two Polish servants to clean the gleaming white house atop a hill overlooking the town.[4] Scott’s brother recalled that the citizens of Morris Run had treated the handsome and intelligent Scott “the way they would treat the heir to the nobleman.... They all treated him with awe.”[5]

Nearing’s father was a small businessman and stockbroker, his mother a vigorous, energetic, and idealistic woman who Nearing later credited for providing an appreciation of the higher things in life – nature, books, and the arts.[6] Despite an upbringing in a life of privilege made possible at some level by the harsh anti-union politics of his patriarchal grandfather,[7] young Scott Nearing nevertheless developed a social conscience, which one of his biographers describes as “a burr under his skin that none of his relatives acquired and that no interpretation satisfactorily explains.”[8] Scott Nearing’s radical worldview would stay with him for the rest of his life.

Nearing graduated from high school in 1901 and enrolled in the University of Pennsylvania Law School, “where coroporate bias so violated his idealism that after one year he quit.”[9] Instead he studied oratory at Temple University in Philadelphia and enrolled in the Wharton School of Business of the University of Pennsylvania, where he immersed himself in the emerging science of economics. At the Wharton School, Nearing was deeply influenced by Simon Nelson Patten, an innovative and unconventional educator and founding father of the American Economic Association.[10] Nearing was molded as a “Wharton man” for the current progressive era, one of the proverbial “best and brightest” trained in practical economics to be readied for a place as a responsible leader of the community.[11] In the words of another of his students, Patten taught innovative thinking – “making use of creative intelligence to master new situations irrespective of received dogma.”[12] Nearing seems to have found these new intellectual tools for potential social change to be exciting and liberating. He completed his undergraduate program in just three years, while simultaneously engaging in campus politics and competitive debate.[13]

Nearing received his BS degree from the University of Pennsylvania in 1905 and his PhD in Economics in 1909. From 1905 to 1907, he served as the Secretary of the Pennsylvania Child Labor Committee, a volunteer society working to solve the child labor problem in the state.[14] From 1908 until 1915, Nearing himself taught economics and sociology at the Wharton School and Swarthmore College, authoring a stream of books on the economics and social problems.[15] Nearing was a staunch advocate of a “new economics” which insisted

“that the economists part company with the ominous pictures of an overpopulated, starving world, prostrate before the throne of ‘competition,’ ‘individual initiative,’ ‘private property,’ or some other pseudo-god, and tell men in simple, straightforward language how they may combine, re-shape, or overcome the laws and utilize them as a blessing instead of enduring them as a burden and a curse.”[16]

Much as Karl Marx drew radical implications from the ideas of the conservative Hegel, Nearing took the economic logic of his department head, Simon Patten, and made radical inferences about wealth and the distribution of income that his mentor had himself hesitated to draw.[17] He believed that unfettered wealth stifled initiative and impeded economic advancement, and hoped that progressive thinkers among the ownership class itself would come to realize the negative impact of economic parasitism and accept their civic duty of enlightened leadership.[18] Nearing instead outlined an economic republicanism based upon “four basic democratic concepts – equality of opportunity, civic obligation, popular government, and human rights.”[19]

Nearing’s aggressive social activism in the classroom and through the printed word brought him into conflict with his own employers at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business, resulting in his dismissal and his emergence as a cause célèbre of the American radical movement for the next decade. On the morning of June 16, 1915, Nearing’s secretary telephoned him to report that a letter from the Provost had arrived, which noted that “as the term of your appointment as assistant professor of economics for 1914-1915 is about to expire, I am directed by the trustees of the University of Pennsylvania to inform you that it will not be renewed.”[20] The Board of Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania was heavily stacked with bankers, corporation lawyers, financiers, and corporation executives, and Nearing’s writing had not gone unnoticed.[21] Nearing’s tenuous situation had been exacerbated by an open letter to The North American in which he challenged the right wing evangelist Billy Sunday to apply the Gospel to the conditions of industrial capitalism, including “the railroad interests... the traction company... the manufacturers... the vested interests.”[22] Reaction to Nearing’s dismissal from the academy was swift, with department head Patten and others issuing statements condemning the decision. Progressives in the Wharton School quickly compiled a summary of the facts of the case and sent it to 1500 newspapers, journals, and academics around the country.[23] Even conservatives in the faculty were deeply troubled since, as one Wharton professor observed, “the moment Nearing went, any conservative statement became but the spoken word of a ‘kept’ professor.”[24] Conversely, some radicals were satisfied for being validated in their belief of the conservative nature of the American academy. Socialist writer Upton Sinclair told Nearing in no uncertain terms in an open letter that “You do not belong in a university. You belong with us Socialists and free lances.... Instead of addressing small numbers of college boys, you will be able to address large audiences of men.”[25] Retrospectively called by one historian “the most famous breach of academic freedom” of the era,[26] the University of Pennsylvania’s action had the effect of making Scott Nearing into a public figure and fueled a long-running discussion about the proper role and rights of the teacher.

From the Fall of 1915, Scott Nearing was established as a radical “public man.” He joined the American Union Against Militarism in 1916 and delivered a series of speeches condemning the “Preparedness” campaign then being promoted by Woodrow Wilson and the nation’s political elite.[27] He also remained a university professor, teaching Social Science at city-owned Toledo University from 1915 through 1917. The intense nationalistic feeling that swept the country now that America was embroiled at last in the war in Europe spelled the end of Nearing’s Toledo days, as he later recalled in his memoirs:

“Al Miller, Chairman of the Toledo Forum, asked me to come to his office. He greeted me pleasantly and then said, ‘As you know, I am attorney for the Toledo Chamber of Commerce, on a permanent retainer. I am their legal spokesman; they are among my clients. They have directed me to introduce a resolution at the next meeting of the Toledo university trustees, ending your connection with the institution.’ He waited a moment for this announcement to sink in.

‘Of Course,’ I said quietly. ‘That is one of the symptoms of war fever. Those who tell the truth or try to tell the truth are among the first victims of any war.’

Al hurried on, ‘You understand, there is nothing personal about this. You and I have worked together on the Forum and other projects with never a real disagreement, certainly never a fight.’

‘That is true,’ I said, ‘and I think our joint efforts have helped to make some real advances here in Toledo.’

‘True,’ said Al. ‘It is also true that I have enjoyed every minute of our cooperation.’ Then he added: ‘At this point I guess we part company. I hope we part as friends, on two sides of the war barrier that separates us. Please remember that there is nothing personal about this,’ he repeated. ‘I respect your stand and wish you well. My duty lies elsewhere.’ We shook hands and I never saw him again.”[28]

Nearing packed up his things and moved to New York City, where he became a founding member of the broad anti-war organization the People’s Council, the establishment of which took place at the so-called First American Conference for Peace and Democracy, held May 30-31, 1917. He assumed the chairmanship of that organization that fall.[29] On July 1, 1917, Nearing joined the Socialist Party and began a new job, working for the next six years as a lecturer in Economics and Sociology at the Socialist Party’s Rand School of Social Science.[30] He was a prolific public speaker during this time, estimating that he had given approximately 200 speeches a year during the war years.[31] Nearing authored a series of pamphlets, published by the Rand School, one of which, The Great Madness: A Victory for the American Plutocracy, resulted in his indictment under the Espionage Act for alleged “obstruction to the recruiting and enlistment service of the United States.”[32] This indictment came down in April of 1918, but it was not until February of 1919 – that is, several months after the war in Europe had actually ended – that the trial against Nearing and the Rand School actually commenced.[33]

The prosecution attempted to show that Nearing, by writing against militarism, had illegally interfered with the ability of the United States government to recruit and conscript troops for its military activities in Europe. It spent its effort making Nearing admit that he had written and spoken against militarism and the war in Europe – which he was quite willing to do. But at the end of the trial, Nearing addressed the jury and made a key point:

“The prosecution has not been able to show a single instance in which recruiting was obstructed. They have not been able to show a single instance in which insubordination, disloyalty, and refusal to duty was caused.”[34]

Nearing noted the evil implications of the government’s attempt to illegalize written dissent:

“The only way to have intelligent public opinion is to have discussion, and the moment you check discussion you destroy democracy....

“The Constitution does not guarantee us only the right to be correct, we have a right to be honest and in error. And the views that I have expressed in this pamphlet I expressed honestly. I believe they were right. The future will show whether or not I was correct, but under the laws, as I understand it, and under the Constitution, as I understand it, every citizen in this country has the right to express himself...on public questions.”[35]

The judge in the case, Julius M. Mayer, dismissed the first two counts of the indictment, alleging conspiracy, without sending them to the jury. Following deliberation, the jury found Scott Nearing not guilty but the American Socialist Society guilty on the third and fourth counts of the indictment. On March 21, 1919, sentence was passed and the American Socialist Society was fined $3,000 (short of the maximum fine of $10,000),[36] a sum which was ultimately collected through small donations from Socialists, labor groups, and civil libertarians in New York City.

The Socialist Party of America split in the summer of 1919, with a factionalized Communist movement leaving to forge an underground existence in the years after the Palmer Raids. A significant organized “left wing” inspired by the Communist International remained in the party through 1921. Scott Nearing does not seem to have participated in the factional politics of these years, although his sympathies may well have rested with the former Socialists now building the various Communist Parties. As an employee of the Socialist Party-affiliated Rand School of Social Science, Nearling remained in the Socialist Party until the end of 1923.[37]

The dramatic decline of the size and strength of the Socialist Party in the first years of the 1920s took its toll on Nearing. The plummeting membership of the SPA – down below the 13,500 member mark for 1921 – stood in marked contrast to the new and rapidly-growing “Legal Political Party” of the Communists, the Workers Party of America (WPA), which passed the Socialist Party in size after only a few months of existence in 1922.[38] Nearing searched his soul in a lecture delivered in January 1923 at the Rand School, later published in the Socialist press, posing the question “What Can the Radical Do?” Nearing argued that the function of the radical was not administrative, but that of external critic.

“The Communist radical of today will be the administrator of tomorrow, and the Communist Society will need the radical as badly as the capitalist society needs him now. It will then be the business of the radical, as it is now, not to take an appointment as justice of the Supreme Court, not to perform any particular function as a part of the established order, but to stand apart and speak his mind about the established order.... A radical who wishes to continue being a radical cannot do so if he is an essential part of the existing order, for then he owes a certain fealty to his position. I have seen Socialists elected to office; they become, not critical functionaries, but administrators, and one cannot be both at the same time.”[39]

It was the radical’s additional function to get in touch with like-minded people in the unions, cooperatives, and in the sphere of political propaganda, Nearing added. In the unions, it was the Communist Party’s Trade Union Educational League that was currently “the liveliest thing in the trade unionism of the Middle West,” attempting at “boring from within” to radicalize the American Federation of Labor. Outside the AF of L, on the “extreme left” was the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), attempting to found revolutionary industrial unions. Cooperators were, by the nature of their task, localized and conservative in their makeup, in Nearing’s view. Publishing was in disarray, with Charles H. Kerr & Co. disorganized by wartime repression and the nature of the economics of publishing such that the production of low cost books a veritable impossibility. With regards to political action, Nearing produced concrete figures to show that since 1912, membership in the Socialist Party had “steadily declined.”[40] Nearing drew an explosive conclusion from this situation:

“That means, if it means anything, that in the United States as it is at present organized, the radical political movements are short-lived. And if that is true, then the Socialist Party has had its day. Through the Middle West recently I found the Socialist Party almost extinct. Since 1920 it has had first the Communist Party and then the Workers Party as rivals....

“The Workers Party has fallen heir to the present radical political situation in the United States. Is it build to represent the American worker? So far the radical movement has represented the European worker in the United States. The opportunities for a radical political party are as great as, or greater than, ever before; the important problem before the Workers Party is to get radical ideas before the workers. Its second and more serious problem is to establish proper relations with Moscow. Moscow is strong; the Workers Party is weak; Moscow can dominate without any trouble.”[41]

Despite these misgivings, the potential of the growing organization appealed to Nearing over the malaise of the fading organization. Nearing finally applied for membership in the WPA in December of 1924; he was, however, initially rejected from membership, living for the next two years as a non-party fellow traveler of the organization. He finally gained admission to the Workers (Communist) Party only in 1927. Nearing went to work on the staff of the CP’s daily newspaper, The Daily Worker, on May 9, 1928, remaining in that position until resigning in January 1930 to publish a study on imperialism which failed to meet the ideological scrutiny of the organization. According to at least one historian, Nearing was formally expelled from the CPUSA in 1930 in connection with this decision.[42]

In 1925, Nearing spent two months in the Soviet Union visiting schools and talking with educational authorities. “It was a fascinating experience to visit this important educational laboratory in its opening experimental stages,” he later recalled, noting that theories were then being actively tested with regards to subject matter, method of instruction, and social organization of students and teachers alike.[43] The result of this visit was one of the first serious studies of the nascent Soviet educational system, a book entitled Education in Soviet Russia.

In 1927, Nearing made his first trip to Asia, traveling to China by ship for a three month stay. En route, the Kuomintang Party split, with forces loyal to Chiang Kai Shek attacking and summarily executing their former Communist allies. As Nearing later recalled

“Leftists were liquidated on sight. The procedure was summary. When one was captured by Chiang’s forces, his arms were held by two Chiang soldiers while a third, with a sword, hacked off his head. The remains were left lying as a warning to other Leftists to follow Chiang or perish. I saw some heads mounted on poles.”[44]

While there Nearing rather boldly gave a speech at Yenching University on his book, The American Empire, in a room darkened so that audience members could not be later identified and denounced. Upon his return to the United States, Nearing authoring a book offering his views on the Chinese situation, entitled Whither China?

Nearing remained a prominent figure of the American Left throughout the decade of the 1920s, producing a seemingly ceaseless series of pamphlets on various radical political themes. He was also engaged professionally on the lecture circuit, making use of an agent to arrange speaking tours for about 20 years. These speaking tours continued into the early 1930s, by which time public interest in attending live speeches and debates on political themes had waned and ill health forced Nearing’s agent into retirement.[45]

In the 1930s and 1940s, the Nearings moved to Winhall in rural Vermont, where they had purchased a rather large forest tract for $2200 and a moderate sized farm for $2500. The family lived there until the coming of the Korean War in 1950. Nearing lived an ascetic and largely self-reliant life, growing much of his own food and putting up nine stone buildings over the course of his two decades there.[46]

Feeling a sense of dignity in the common man, and wanting to serve, Nearing wrote and self-published many pamphlets on topics such as low income, peace throughout the world, feminism, and different environmental causes.

Nearing was the father of John Scott, who wrote a participant’s account of having worked in industry in the Soviet Union during the 1930s.

A consistent pacifist, Nearing opposed American participation in World War II throughout the conflict. In 1943 he was fired by the Federated Press for his anti-war position, which Managing Editor Carl Haessler criticized as “childish.”[47]. Nearing was particularly shocked by the nuclear bombing of Japan, writing to President Harry S. Truman on August 6, 1945, the day the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, that “your government is no longer mine.”

In 1954 he co-authored Living the Good Life: How to Live Simply and Sanely in a Troubled World with his wife Helen. The book, in which war, famine, and poverty were discussed, described a nineteen-year “back to the land experiment,” and also advocated a modern day “homesteading.”

In the winter of 1956-57, Scott and Helen Nearing toured Canada, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Europe, generating a book about their experiences called Socialists Around the World. The following winter, with their passports issued in 1956 nearing expiration, Scott and Helen Nearing embarked upon a trip through the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China. They returned home to Maine to write a book of their experiences, entitled The Brave New World. The pair visited Leningrad, Moscow, Stalingrad, Baku, Taskent, and Irkutsk, touring schools and universities, apartment buildings in the process of construction, factories, and collective farms in the course of their trip. In China they saw Peking (Beijing), Wuhan and Nanking.[48] The two countries were characterized in the Nearings’ travelogue as “peaceful socialist giants”:

“The pro-peace attitude of the people of the Soviet Union and People’s China is not based on fear of war but on confidence in their theory and way of life. One Soviet trade unionist put the matter to us in this way. ‘We are not afraid of war. We have been through it and survived its cruelties and horrors. We know that we can take it. Just because we have been through it and suffered from it, we know how terrible war is. It wastes materials, but worse than that, it squanders human idealism, energy, wealth and life. Still worse, those of us who are trying to build a socialst society are diverted and preoccupied by war. We know from bitter experience that if we are to engage in socialist construction we cannot fight wars. War is a full-time occupation.’”[49]

In the wake of their travels to the USSR and China, Scott Nearing seems to have drawn somewhat closer once again to the Communist Party, whose official publishing house, New Century Publishers, produced Nearing pamphlets on Eastern Europe and Cuba in 1962 and 1963.[50]

As the Vietnam War took center stage in the mid-1960s, and as a large back-to-the-land movement developed in the U.S., a renewed interest in Nearing’s work and ideas occurred. Hundreds of anti-war believers flocked to Nearing’s home in Maine to learn homesteading practical-living skills, some also to hear a master radical’s anti-war message.

In 1973, the University of Pennsylvania formally reversed its dismissal of Nearing in 1915 by awarding him the title of Honorary Emeritus Professor of Economics.

Nearing appears in the film Reds (1981), as one of the many documentary “witnesses,” telling stories of his friend John Reed and of the heady days leading up to the Russian Revolution.

Scott Nearing died on August 24, 1983, just eighteen days after his 100th birthday.

In addition to working variously as a teacher, paid public speaker, and author, throughout his life Scott Nearing was a regular contributor of commentary on foreign affairs. As an octogenarian summing up his life, Nearing recalled

“I have spent 70 years of study and travel in order to equip myself with information that would enable me to speak and write with authority on the course of world affairs. The authority I have sought is not in any sense political. It is the authority that results from collecting and classifying information on a scientific level and interpreting facts as I have found them. Since I do not speak with political authority I have no means of communicating my conclusions except by putting them in print myself and distributing them n the most advantageous way that is available to a private citizen.”[51]

Through the years, these foreign affairs writings made use of several different channels of distribution. In 1921 Nearing was, along with his colleague Louis Lochner, a co-founder of a forerunner of the Federated Press, a news service which sent out domestic and international news releases and picture mats five days a week to the labor and radical press in America. Nearing remained a regular contributor to the Federated Press (controlled by the Communist Party for most of its existence) until 1943, when he was fired for his anti-war position, which Federated Press editor Carl Haessler characterized as “childish.”[52] Nearing then began to contribute to an obscure monthly newsletter from Florida, World Events.

Shortly after its founding in 1949, Nearing began contributing a monthly “World Events” column to the independent theoretical monthly, Monthly Review, established by dissident Marxist economists Paul Sweezy and Leo Huberman. Nearing tellingly characterized the objective of this publication as “the dissemination of a true understanding of society and the reporting of dependable news of the movement toward a socialist society which is steadily spreading over the face of the globe.”[53] Through the decades, Nearing wrote thousands of pages of news and commentary on these themes, retiring from this activity only in 1970, at the age of 87.

During his 1919 trial for allegedly obstructing American military recruitment during World War I, at which he testified in his own defense, the prosecution asked Scott Nearing whether he was a “pacifist socialist.” Nearing’s reply was illuminating – he replied that he was a “pacifist” and left it at that. Prosecutor Earl B. Barnes was taken aback and asked for clarification:

Q: You are a pacifist even to class struggles?
[Nearing]: I am a pacifist in that I believe that no man has a right to do violence to any other man.
Q: Even in the class struggle?
[Nearing]: Under no circumstances.[54]

Half a century later, writing in his 1972 autobiography, The Making of a Radical, Scott Nearing described himself as a pacifist, a socialist, and a vegetarian. In his autobiography he says “I became a vegetarian because I was persuaded that life is as valid for other creatures as it is for humans. I do not need dead animal bodies to keep me alive, strong and healthy. Therefore, I will not kill for food.”[55] Nearing listed his four most influential teachers as Leo Tolstoy, Simon Nelson Patten, his grandfather and mother. Other influences he acknowledged in his memoirs included Socrates, Gautama Buddha, Lao Tzu, Mahatma Gandhi, Jesus, Confucius, Henry David Thoreau, Charles Otis Whitman, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Victor Hugo, Edward Bellamy, Olive Schreiner, Richard Maurice Bucke, and Romain Rolland’s Jean-Christophe.[56]

Scott Nearing’s journey over a century was neatly (albeit perhaps facilely) described by one biographer as follows:

“Nearing’s intellectual development followed a path of increasing awareness of the intransigence of the dominant classes of capitalist culture to adopt reforms that would spread the enlightenment and opportunities of the leisure classes to society as a whole. From the time of his firing from the University of Pennsylvania in 1915 through the aftermath of World War I, he experienced the limits of permissible questioning of conventional wisdom. His long, difficult journey from an orthodox reformer of the ruling class from within to a complete secessionist from capitalist cultural hegemony led him by 1932 to choose homesteading – an experiment Nearing called ‘living the good life.’

“In that spirit, Nearing moved through a series of secessions – from Christianity, from politics, and finally from American society itself. He voyaged to the wilderness as if on a pilgrimage to a sacred place. His experience, along with a deeper understanding of American culture, led to the inescapable consciousness that capitalist cultural dominance was too strong to eliminate and therefore too powerful to control or mold to liberal purposes. The secessions in his life were progressive repudiations of American canons of moral conduct as well as indications of Nearing’s perception of the fragmented, segmented, discontinuous nature of American society. Only in the isolated private sphere provided by homesteading could a radical resistance and constructive challenge to capitalist culture be nurtured.

“In his devotion to conscientious self-reliance, Nearing emerged as a twentieth-century colleague of Emerson and Thoreau.”[57]

This view, that Nearing chose to “drop out” of politics and society itself and live life as a rugged agrarian individualist at one with nature, is a common interpretation – and certainly one with some merit. Another possible reading of Nearing’s motivations and decision-making lies in his own writing. Nearing repeatedly drew inspiration from the life story of Count Leo Tolstoi, whose life Nearing clearly saw as analogous to his own:

“Count Leo Tolstoi is a classic example of an individual in potential and actual conflict with his group. He was talented and had immense vitality. Until young manhood he accepted his place in the Tsarist social pattern and generally conformed to it. After some drastic experiences and much soul searching, Leo Tolstoi challenged the social system under which he lived to mortal combat. From that point until the day he left home and died in a railway station in his final attempt to win out against group pressures, his life consisted of combats with members of his family, with members of the neighboring nobility, with the army, with the Tsarist autocracy and with the established church.”[58]

The tension between the dissident individual and the group was an unenviable one, Nearing believed. In the conflict between the solitary individual and the community, Nearing saw only three possible outcomes:

“(1) The individual may win out and impose himself and his ideas upon the group. The normal consequence of such an outcome is a personal dictatorship or the imposition upon the community of an oligarchy in which the dissident individual or individuals play a prominent role. (2) The division of the community into factions, one of which upholds the dissident individual, with a stalemate leading to feuding, rebellion, civil war. (3) The group wins out, imposes its will and eliminates the non-conformist. Such conflict sequences have occurred repeatedly in contemporary and in earlier history.”[59]

Nearing’s chosen lifestyle of “Tolstoian,” ascetic, rural self-sufficiency may be reasonably interpreted as the attempt of a self-aware dissident individual to avoid inevitably negative participation in the internal life of the group (be it government or political party), while retaining a keen and almost obsessive interest in the dynamics of society and the world as a whole.

Allen Ginsberg, the Beat Generation poet, referred to Nearing as a “grand old man, a real mensch” in his poem America.


1. John A. Saltmarsh, Scott Nearing: An Intellectual Biography. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1991; pg. 7.

2. Stephen J. Whitfield, Scott Nearing: Apostle of American Radicalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974; pp. 3-5.

3. Scott Nearing, The Making of a Radical: A Political Autobiography. New York: Harper and Row, 1972; pg. 29.

4. Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 6.

5. Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 6.

6. Saltmarsh, Scott Nearing, pg. 8.

7. Historian Stephen J. Whitfield describes Winfield Scott Nearing as “imperious and remorseless to his employees” and details the way in which the company drove out strikers from their company-owned homes during a strike in the winter of 1873. Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 3.

8. Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 6.

9. Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 7.

10. Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 8.

11. Saltmarsh, Scott Nearing, pg. 18.

12. Rexford Tugwell, cited in Saltmarsh, Scott Nearing, pg. 18.

13. Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 8.

14. Scott Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, New York City, February 5th to 19th, 1919. New York: Rand School of Social Science, 1919; pg. 26.

15. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society, pg. 26.

16. Scott Nearing, Social Sanity: A Preface to the Book of Social Progress. New York: Moffat, Yard & Co., 1913; pp., 70-71. Cited in Saltmarsh, Scott Nearing, pg. 28.

17. Saltmarsh, Scott Nearing, pg. 31.

18. Saltmarsh, Scott Nearing, pg. 36.

19. Saltmarsh, Scott Nearing, pg. 38.

20. Quoted in Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 25.

21. The 1915 Board included banker Effingham Morris; corporation lawyers George Wharton Pepper and J. Levering Jones; E.T. Stotesbury of J.P. Morgan & Co.; and Randal Morgan, an executive with the United Gas Improvement Company. Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 26.

22. Quoted in Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 6.

23. Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 36.

24. Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 36.

25. Quoted in Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 40.

26. Quoted in Whitfield, Scott Nearing, pg. 43.

27. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society, pp. 33, 102.

28. Scott Nearing, The Making of a Radical: A Political Autobiography. New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1972; pg. 101.

29. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society, pg. 107.

30. Nearing gives the exact date of his Socialist Party membership in his 1919 court testimony. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society, pg. 110.

31. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society, pg. 106.

32. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society, pg. 17.

33. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Societ,pg. 7.

34. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society, pg. 183.

35. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society, pg. 186.

36. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society, pg. 249.

37. John Saltmarsh in his intellectual biography of Scott Nearing has “1922” listed as the last date of Nearing’s party membership in the SPA (pg. 2). Archival documents of the Communist Party housed by the Comintern in Moscow [RGASPI, fond 515, opis 1] indicate Nearing was a member of the SPA until the last day of 1923, however. He was clearly still lecturing at the Rand School in that year (see, for example, Nearing’s “What Can the Radical Do?” the stenographic report of one of Nearing’s Rand School lectured, published in the Sunday magazine section of the New York Call, an SP-affiliated daily on Feb. 4, 1923.

38. Official SPA statistics for 1921 show an average monthly paid membership of 13,484. Solon DeLeon (ed.), The American Labor Year Book, 1923-24. New York: Rand School of Social Science, 1924; pg. 125. Nearing noted in a Rand School lecture that National Chairman Jim Cannon of the WPA had estimated a paid membership for that organization of about 20,000 for November 1922, less than a year after its formation. Scott Nearing, “What Can the Radical Do?” New York Call, Feb. 4, 1923, magazine supplement pg. 5.

39. Nearing, “What Can the Radical Do?” New York Call, Feb. 4, 1923, magazine supplement pg. 5.

40. Nearing, “What Can the Radical Do?” New York Call, Feb. 4, 1923, magazine supplement pg. 5.

41. Nearing, “What Can the Radical Do?” New York Call, Feb. 4, 1923, magazine supplement pg. 5.

42. Saltmarsh, Scott Nearing, pg. 2.

43. Nearing, A Radical Life, pg. 140.

44. Nearing, The Making of a Radical, pg. 142.

45. Nearing, The Making of a Radical, pg. 162.

46. Nearing, The Making of a Radical, pg. 47.

47. Nearing,The Making of a Radical,” pg. 173.

48. Scott and Helen Nearing, The Brave New World. Harborside, ME: Social Science Institute, 1958; passim.

49. Nearings, The Brave New World, pg. 212.

50. Socialism in Practice: Transformation of East Europe. (1962); Cuba and Latin America: Eyewitness Report on the Continental Congress for Solidarity with Cuba. (1963)

51. Nearing, The Making of a Radical, pg. 164.

52. Nearing, The Making of a Radical, pg. 173.

53. Nearing, The Making of a Radical, pg. 173.

54. Nearing, The Trial of Scott Nearing and the American Socialist Society, pg. 114.

55. Nearing, The Making of a Radical, pg. 123.

56. Nearing, The Making of a Radical, pg. 29.

57. Saltmarsh, Scott Nearing, pp. 2-3.

58. Scott Nearing, Freedom: Promise and Menace. Harborside, ME: Social Science Institute, 1961; pg. 124.

59. Scott Nearing, Freedom: Promise and Menace, pg. 125.

Books and Pamphlets by Scott Nearing

Titles published through 1915

Titles published during Nearing’s Socialist Party Period (1916-1923)

Titles published during Nearing’s Communist Period (1924-1929)

Independent Radicalism from The Depression through World War II (1930-1945)

Independent Radicalism After World War II (1946-1979)

Further Reading


Neebe, Oscar (1850-1915)

One of the Haymarket defendants. He was born in New York City and joined in labor politics after moving to Chicago in 1875. A tinsmith by trade, he was a member of the anarchist International Working People's Association (IWPA). With little evidence other than association, Neebe was sentenced to jail for 15 years, and served six before being pardoned. He was not present at the Haymarket meeting.

Further Reading:
Neebe's speech in court
Subject: May Day.


Nekrassov, Nikolai Vissarionovich (1879- )

Cadet. Professor Tomsk Technological Institute. Member 3rd and 4th Dumas. Minister of Communications, March-July 1917. Minister of Finance, August-September 1917. Remained in Russia after the Revolution and worked for the Soviet Government.


Isaac Newton

Newton, Isaac (1642-1727)

English physicist and mathematician; founder of classical mechanics, theory of universal gravitation and calculus; provided the foundation of the scientific explanation of a vast number of phenomena of nature in mechanical terms and provided the basis for an integral picture of the world; while Newton's theory provided the seeming basis for the eventual explanation of all the phenomena of Nature in terms of the effect of objects one upon another, a "prime impulse", attributable to God was required to "set the mechanism in motion".

Newton's contribution to the development of science and philosophy and all aspects of social development is almost immeasurable. While those who had gone before him in the sciences of mathematics, optics, astronomy, mechanics, etc., had collected numerous observations and developed some crucial concepts, in the space of a single life-time (without getting into the dispute about share of credit due to Newton or Leibniz) Newton took some scattered observations and insights and built a theoretical system which brought within the scope of a single, rational, mathematical theory virtually all phenomena of the Universe. Most notably he brought within the scope of a single concept the force which caused the Heavenly Bodies to "fall" across the sky and the common-or-garden objects which we perceive and handle in our daily lives here on Earth.

The discovery of the branch of mathematics known as Calculus, which Newton helped build as did Leibniz, provided a tool of enormous power for the formulation of a mathematical view of Nature. The peculiarity of calculus is that it's supposed derivation from lower mathematics is not (at least until very recent times) reducable to the constraints of formal logic. So while providing future generations with a wonderfully simple and comprehensive mechanical view of Nature, he also introduced a fundamental and irreducible contradiction into mathematics.

The enormous power of this view of the world has to be taken account of. Those who came after him must have felt there was little left to be done but tidy up the edges. The blow dealt to religion and the impetus given to the development of science and industry is gigantic, despite the fact that Newton remained a devout Christian to his dying day.

Nevertheless, in the political struggles of his day, Newton was the Devil incarnate or the source of all light, respective of one's political position. His view of scientific method, space and time, knowledge, God and truth was a dominant force throughout the nineteenth century.

Further Reading: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy.